Oregon Volvo Tuners Forum « Login « Register « Sidebar
Gallery » Member's Rides » Kyle (klr142) » My '91 244! » Dyno charts
 
Page: 1 2
 

Dyno charts

Date: 03/17/2009
Owner: Kyle Eisenbach
Size: 40 items
B vs RSI 2 advanced

B vs RSI 2 advanced

B cam straight up vs RSI cam 2 deg. advanced, except the RSI cam's numbers being lower than should be due to dyno changes(~5-10hp).

Date: 03/17/2009
Views: 171
RSI cam, mike's chips and 3 deg. ign. adv.

RSI cam, mike's chips and 3 deg. ign. adv.

RSI cam in various orientations, Mike's chips and 3 deg. ignition advance, except the RSI cam's numbers being lower than should be due to dyno changes(~5-10hp).

Date: 03/17/2009
Views: 124
D adv.2 vs RSI

D adv.2 vs RSI

D cam vs RSI cam, except the RSI cam's numbers being lower than should be due to dyno changes(~5-10hp).

Date: 03/17/2009
Views: 114
A adv. 2 vs B straight up, ish uncorr

A adv. 2 vs B straight up, ish uncorr

Date: 03/17/2009
Views: 119
A adv. 2 vs B straight up, ish

A adv. 2 vs B straight up, ish

Date: 03/17/2009
Views: 110
A cam(rich5.5k+) vs. IPDT both adv. 2 deg

A cam(rich5.5k+) vs. IPDT both adv. 2 deg

Date: 03/17/2009
Views: 112
high redline

high redline

Except the RSI cam's numbers being lower than should be due to dyno changes(~5-10hp).

Date: 03/17/2009
Views: 132
IPDT vs D cam both adv. 2 deg.

IPDT vs D cam both adv. 2 deg.

Date: 03/17/2009
Views: 165
no AC-PS-clutch fan vs with

no AC-PS-clutch fan vs with

No clutch fan, power steering or AC versus the same setup WITH all intact.

Date: 03/17/2009
Views: 156
uncorrected

uncorrected

Going for big looks, except the RSI cam's numbers being lower than should be due to dyno changes(~5-10hp).

Date: 03/17/2009
Views: 142
1/07/06 Dyno sheet, Airbox mod and V15 only

1/07/06 Dyno sheet, Airbox mod and V15 only

Date: 01/10/2006
Views: 308
Kyle Eisenbach   91 244 Volvo

Kyle Eisenbach 91 244 Volvo

Date: 01/25/2006
Views: 586
IMG 0002 6

IMG 0002 6

Date: 05/01/2007
Views: 183
IMG 0211

IMG 0211

Date: 01/25/2008
Views: 171
IMG_0673

IMG_0673

All runs uncorrected, so not directly comparable:
Run 1 is A cam advanced 2 degrees without being "tuned" above 5.5krpm. Run 2 is A cam straight up and "tuned" up top. Run 3 is IPD Turbo cam 2 degrees advanced and "tuned".

Date: 10/17/2008
Views: 193
IMG_0675

IMG_0675

SAE corrected version of A cam vs IPD Turbo cam. Sadly not as good of a graph, but hey, the corrected numbers are there.

Date: 10/24/2008
Views: 158
IMG_0677

IMG_0677

Closer up.

Date: 10/24/2008
Views: 181
IMG_0682

IMG_0682

Chips vs. stock LH2.4... So far not good. The chips were down 4-5 lb-ft across the board pretty much until this last run, where we "cheated" and put a big fan over the intake for 15 minutes for a "power pull". Even then it only bare

Date: 11/02/2008
Views: 164
IMG_0683

IMG_0683

IPD Turbo cam with stock chips, advanced 2 degrees, and 3 degrees ignition advance vs D cam 2 deg. advanced, fred's chips w/ignition advanced 3 degrees. If anything, Fred's chips reduced power throughout too, so...

Date: 11/07/2008
Views: 144
IMG_0686

IMG_0686

Reset chipped ICU, D cam advanced 2 degrees, 3 deg. ignition advance, chipped ECU, no PS/AC/Clutch fan vs. with PS/AC/Clutch and non-reset ICU

Date: 11/10/2008
Views: 121
 
Page: 1 2
 

Actions

Advanced Search
Mount with WebDAV RSS Feed for this Album Show a Google Map View Slideshow View Slideshow (Fullscreen) View in Google Earth

My '91 244!

1. Drag times 2. Dyno charts 3. 2.5" exhaust 4. Suburban... 5. Kyleshead 6. RSI's NA... 7. Meteors? ... 248. KLRvs146vs1...

Random Image

DSC_0053

DSC_0053

Date: 09/07/2003 Views: 135

Powered by Gallery v2.2